- Blog EPC Contractors EPC projects Project control
- 28 Mar 2023
Undisputed Change Requests in EPC projects
EPC projects are predominantly executed through the LSTM or Lump Sum Turnkey Model, especially in the Energy Sector where the scope is defined for the Contractor to execute the project within a given schedule. In this model, the risk of schedule and cost variations is borne entirely by the Contractor.
Contractors win projects through the competitive bidding process. There is literally no scope for any deviations because these projects tend to be executed at cost or with a very small margin. Neither the Contractor nor the Owners want a deviation in scope or hindrances during the execution phase as these will cause undue delay in realizing the project objectives for the Owner while increasing the execution costs for the Contractor. Yet that is exactly what is happening around the industry – in almost every project being executed there are variations, claims, EOT requests, etc. How are these to be resolved? At whose cost? Is there a way to have a win-win situation for all the stakeholders?
These are tough questions that have plagued the industry for a long time. To resolve them, here are some general procedures that can be enforced:
- The Contractor must submit the request for change in the contract.
- The Owner/Consultant must evaluate the request carefully before accepting the contractually tenable ones (for further evaluation) or rejecting the non-tenable ones.
- The Owner must insist that the Contractor provides supporting documentation to help review the tenable requests.
- The Contractor must substantiate the change request with the appropriate documented evidence.
- A rejected change request must follow the prescribed claim resolution process.
These may sound simple, but over the years I have seen multiple instances where Contractors failed to submit documentary evidence to support change requests even though the Owner had accepted them as tenable change requests! In this case ie when the Contractor fails to provide the requested evidence as support documents, the owners cannot do more than sympathize with the Contractor as there is no further processing that can be done without solid evidence to prove that this was a change initiated by the Owner.
So the question arises: even when it is in his best interests why does a contractor not submit the requested documentation to the owner?
In my view, it could be because the contractor tried to do “Gold Plating” (made an improvement or enhancement without the owner’s approval), proceeded with a change on merely verbal instructions, or omitted to intimate the Owner about a change and its potential impacts (as he should have done per the terms of Contract) – or all the above. I have also seen situations where the Contractor executed the additional scope of work and the Owner was ready to compensate him for it but was unable to process the change requests due to a lack of documentary evidence.
These are just a few examples of the kinds of lose-lose situations that arise due to the lack of documentary evidence ready to hand.
How do we resolve this?
For a start, I believe all the communications should be properly documented from the get-go, and they should be tracked in real-time and stored in a central location. Also, Contractors and Owners must collaborate on a common platform, which will allow them to track all project correspondences as required.
Fortunately, today’s technology can provide the above.
The advent of modern digital solutions has made it possible to establish a common space for all the correspondences that are exchanged and stored during a project so that at any point in time all the correspondences are visible to all the stakeholders, including correspondence pertaining to the status of the incoming and outgoing communications between parties and the time taken to respond to each. In these digital systems, if any of the correspondences are not duly responded to the system will automatically send alerts and escalations to the appropriate stakeholders.
The fact is, changes will happen in the scope/condition of every Project – that is inevitable. But a digital system can ensure that the change in schedule and the cost gets approved only if the change in scope and bid conditions are proved to the hilt with undisputed documentary evidence.
In conclusion, contract changes need to be managed based on the merits of each case with concrete evidence of the changes requested/approved/executed and not at an individual’s discretion (which may or may not be contractually or legally tenable). This will go a long way in ensuring that the owner and contractor both maximize their profits.
Sajith is a Graduate Engineer and certified Project Management Professional from PMI who carries 30 years of industry experience. He has deep domain expertise in EPC who worked with major EPC Contractors and owner organisations in the Oil & Gas sector, including Petrofac, KNPC, KIPIC, Chevron, Almeer, BPL Ltd etc.. Sajith has executed EPC projects valuing around 500 M USD, and has been associated with a 16 billion USD new refinery project in Kuwait.
Related Posts
EPCM Systems in the Age of Digital Transformation
It’s become commonplace to hear statements about “The Benefits of Digital EPC software’ and ‘The Future of the Construction Industry’ and ‘Digital transformation in EPC sectors’, with some pundits dubbing the current era EPC 2.0…
- 14 Nov 2024
Measuring ROI and Performance Metrics of PMIS Implementation
The adoption of PMIS systems has increased significantly in recent years as the trend of digitally transforming the EPC process continues to grow at a rapid pace. For such organisations, understanding how the features of…
- 17 Oct 2024
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- September 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- January 2022
- November 2021
- October 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- June 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- December 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017