- Blog
- 15 Jan 2017
Why do construction projects fail? 1/3
Factors that cause delay in project (1/3)
Everyone I meet in the construction industry has a theory about why projects fail. Manpower issues, market landscapes, geo-political forces, or the evergreen ‘it is the nature of projects’. All true, in their own way. But I have my own theory.
Let’s define the question. What does failure mean? It means when a project goes over the stipulated schedule and/or over the allocated budget. Leaving quality aside for the moment, these two, time and budget, are the fundamental parameters of project success. And by those parameters most projects today would be marked ‘failed’. So the question becomes, what causes projects to go over time and over budget?
When I started crystallizing my thoughts on this it occurred to me that we’re dealing with a question as old as civilization itself. Man has always been a builder. Did the pyramid builders have this same problem I wonder? Did the ancient greeks – and geeks – also struggle with ‘planned’ vs ‘actual’?
Why does a species that loves to build still battle something as basic as time vs cost? With all the new science and technology at our disposal, what are we missing?
I say we’re missing the big picture. We’re not seeing the forest for the trees. We’re trying to treat something symptomatically that can only be solved holistically.
Think about the human body. Projects are a bit like that – a mass of complex, intricate, and interconnected systems. If, for example, there’s a quality problem, don’t look for the solution in your quality department or your PMBOK manual, look at your engineering team and how they interact with vendors in another country. Look at your email system – are things falling through the cracks because correspondence is simply not getting through in time? Look at the entire project process as a whole, and you’ll solve the specific bottlenecks.
Let’s talk specifics. To start with, Planning.
As the saying goes, for best results, plan twice and do once. But in EPC projects even planning once is a challenge. And the reason for that is the lack of ‘holistic’ thinking. For example: engineering does planning, procurement does planning, construction does it also – but end of the day, all the planning is geared towards construction so instead of planning in silos why not plan with the end in mind? Planning is a means to an end, not the end itself. But the way projects and project organisations are structured, planning all too often does happen in such silos, and does become an end in itself. That is where the trouble starts. If you don’t plan with the final goal in mind, you’re bound to suffer some degree of tunnel vision.
If, on the other hand planning required engineering and procurement teams to think in terms of what is required for construction – what procurement item should be ordered, what utility things are required in terms of scaffolding, what is required for cranes and so on – then everybody works with the same end game in mind. Milestones become just that – milestones. Not deliverables in and of themselves.
And if you plan like this at the desk, then when you finally put the construction crew to work, you’ve already anticipated and solved a bunch of bottlenecks that might have otherwise cropped up and caused, you guessed it, delays. But if you planned with the big picture in mind at every step you won’t end up rushing through things as deadlines loom closer, you won’t make mistakes in haste. And the mistakes you do make (because mistakes are inevitable in a human-driven process) will be easy to catch and correct before they affect the entire schedule.
To sum up: delay is cumulative so the anti-delay steps must be cumulative also. Don’t aim for one change or one set of changes, aim to set up a working culture and environment where constant awareness of the end goal and constant correction to reach that goal becomes a way of life. Do this and you’ll be firmly on the track to effective and successful project delivery, even in fast-track projects.
In part 2 of this series I will address the lack of effective monitoring and how it contributes to project delay.
Leave a comment or a question and I’ll do my best to get back to you.
Related Posts
Importance of Collaboration and Communication in Project Management in EPC Projects
As the EPC industry moves steadily towards digitisation and we’re seeing the emergence of an ever-increasing array of digital project management systems and Project Management Information systems (PMIS) in project management, it’s interesting to look…
- 21 Nov 2024
EPCM Systems in the Age of Digital Transformation
It’s become commonplace to hear statements about “The Benefits of Digital EPC software’ and ‘The Future of the Construction Industry’ and ‘Digital transformation in EPC sectors’, with some pundits dubbing the current era EPC 2.0…
- 14 Nov 2024
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- September 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- January 2022
- November 2021
- October 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- June 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- December 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017